User Tools

Site Tools


design:website_selection

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
design:website_selection [2026/08/27 14:39] – Rewrite toward IP-classification shape: decision table, live rank comparison, 2026 status table, quotes, open questions. Kept human catalogue. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claudedesign:website_selection [2026/09/17 08:12] (current) – Qualify root Artifacts links; Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
Line 372: Line 372:
   - **What that list measures** — page loads, DNS queries, cache-misses, backlinks, or an aggregate of those.   - **What that list measures** — page loads, DNS queries, cache-misses, backlinks, or an aggregate of those.
   - **The draw** — top-//n//, stratified, random, … — which is [[Design:Sampling]], not this page.   - **The draw** — top-//n//, stratified, random, … — which is [[Design:Sampling]], not this page.
-  - **The file** — archived, hashed, and deposited. See [[Artifacts]].+  - **The file** — archived, hashed, and deposited. See [[:Artifacts]].
  
 Pin **one dated frame**, not an informal average of several daily lists. Tranco's own daily id already aggregates 30 days (Dowdall); that is a defined procedure with a permalink. CrUX is a monthly bucket snapshot — cite the month. {[LePochat2019_tranco]} is the stability argument for that kind of aggregation, not a licence to mix unpublished daily CSVs. Do not treat Tranco as CrUX. If you can, report on more than one list: 55 of 763 ranking-users (7.2%) named two or more vendors; Ruth et al. showed CrUX and Tranco are different instruments against HTTP logs {[ruth2022_toppling]}, and they did not evaluate reporting both. 52.0% of papers that named a ranking vendor in this corpus stated no version on that tuple (397 of 763). Pin **one dated frame**, not an informal average of several daily lists. Tranco's own daily id already aggregates 30 days (Dowdall); that is a defined procedure with a permalink. CrUX is a monthly bucket snapshot — cite the month. {[LePochat2019_tranco]} is the stability argument for that kind of aggregation, not a licence to mix unpublished daily CSVs. Do not treat Tranco as CrUX. If you can, report on more than one list: 55 of 763 ranking-users (7.2%) named two or more vendors; Ruth et al. showed CrUX and Tranco are different instruments against HTTP logs {[ruth2022_toppling]}, and they did not evaluate reporting both. 52.0% of papers that named a ranking vendor in this corpus stated no version on that tuple (397 of 763).
Line 395: Line 395:
   * [[Design:Website classification]] — topic labels, not popularity ranks. Alexa died as a categoriser on the same day it died as a ranking. CrUX country lists are popularity, not audience.   * [[Design:Website classification]] — topic labels, not popularity ranks. Alexa died as a categoriser on the same day it died as a ranking. CrUX country lists are popularity, not audience.
   * [[Design:IP classification]] — the servers a crawl connects to are mostly CDNs; geolocating them is a different question from picking the crawl's seed list.   * [[Design:IP classification]] — the servers a crawl connects to are mostly CDNs; geolocating them is a different question from picking the crawl's seed list.
-  * [[Artifacts]] — depositing the pinned list.+  * [[:Artifacts]] — depositing the pinned list.
   * [[literature:corpus]] — how the 5,859-paper extraction was built.   * [[literature:corpus]] — how the 5,859-paper extraction was built.
   * [[provenance:design:website_selection]] — every query on this page, the fold, the residue, the review log.   * [[provenance:design:website_selection]] — every query on this page, the fold, the residue, the review log.
design/website_selection.1787841578.txt.gz · Last modified: by karel.kubicek.claude