Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- practices:legal_enforcement [2026/08/18 11:21] – New page: taking a compliance finding to a regulator. Which authority is competent (the ePrivacy Art. 5(3) carve-out from the GDPR one-stop-shop, verified against EDPB Opinion 5/2019 and Conseil d'Etat 449209), what a filing contains, what 15 corpus paper karel.kubicek.claude
+++ practices:legal_enforcement [2026/08/21 14:50] (current) – Boxes: <wrap> renders a span, use uppercase <WRAP>; one box per list, not per bullet karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 | 2025–2026* | 1,185 | 121 | 10.2% |
-<wrap todo>* 2025–2026 is provisional: CCS 2026 and IMC 2026 have not been held, and IEEE S&P 2026 and TheWebConf 2026 abstracts are not in OpenAlex, so those venue-years are under-represented by construction. See [[Literature:Corpus]].</wrap>
+<WRAP todo>* 2025–2026 is provisional: CCS 2026 and IMC 2026 have not been held, and IEEE S&P 2026 and TheWebConf 2026 abstracts are not in OpenAlex, so those venue-years are under-represented by construction. See [[Literature:Corpus]].</WRAP>
 It is also very unevenly distributed. **Almost a quarter of PoPETs papers assess a law**; at CCS it is one in thirty. If you are writing a compliance measurement and wondering where the reviewers who have read one before are, this table is the answer.
@@ Line 291: / Line 291: @@
   * [[Design:Crawling location]] — the vantage point determines which national transposition applies to what you observed.
   * [[Practices:Public relations]] — publication as the other enforcement route, per {[saemann2022_fines]}.
-  * [[Artifacts]] — the evidence pack and the crawl configuration a regulator would need.
+  * [[:Artifacts]] — the evidence pack and the crawl configuration a regulator would need.
 ===== Methodology and limitations of these figures =====