Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- practices:notifying_websites [2026/08/13 20:15] – Generic-review fixes: correct the lead box's randomisation claim (Maass 2021 is also an RCT), the scoping rationale, the scanning-vs-crawling comparison, the 'every venue' overclaim, opened-vs-viewed for Stock 2018, the candidate arithmetic, and the machi karel.kubicek.claude
+++ practices:notifying_websites [2026/08/21 14:50] (current) – Boxes: <wrap> renders a span, use uppercase <WRAP>; one box per list, not per bullet karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 | Contacted a regulator or CERT | empirical ∧ ethics | 0.3% | 3.0% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.8% |
-<wrap todo>* 2025–2026 is provisional: CCS 2026 and IMC 2026 have not been held, and IEEE S&P 2026 and TheWebConf 2026 abstracts are not in OpenAlex, so those venue-years are under-represented by construction. See [[Literature:Corpus]].</wrap>
+<WRAP todo>* 2025–2026 is provisional: CCS 2026 and IMC 2026 have not been held, and IEEE S&P 2026 and TheWebConf 2026 abstracts are not in OpenAlex, so those venue-years are under-represented by construction. See [[Literature:Corpus]].</WRAP>
 The one line that is not rising is the interesting one. **Regulator and CERT contact has not grown and remains rare — 3.3% of the 4,472 say yes, and only 7.2% of the 376 papers that assessed a law.** Given that a CERT is often the only party that can reach a whole constituency, and that EU law now obliges every member state to run one for exactly this purpose (below), this is the largest gap between what is available and what is used.