| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |
| privacy:fingerprinting [2026/09/04 17:29] – Citekey consolidation 2026-09-04: repoint duplicate bibliography keys (fouad2022my/boettger2025_regional/ahmad2026_ipfp/bouhoula2024automated/lerner2016internet) to the kept key; no prose or figure changed. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude | privacy:fingerprinting [2026/09/21 13:30] (current) – Spot-check bullet: quote_check.mjs now falls back to a pypdf rendering; 544 quotes = 312 exact / 140 partial / 50 rescued / 42 below in both. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude |
|---|
| * **Field stability.** Enum fields (''platforms'', ''crawlConfig.*'', ''legal.law'') reproduce to within a few points on a repeat extraction and carry percentages here. ''detection.phenomenon'' does not, which is what the whole folding exercise is for — the family table is a set of rankings with an honest residue, not a measurement. | * **Field stability.** Enum fields (''platforms'', ''crawlConfig.*'', ''legal.law'') reproduce to within a few points on a repeat extraction and carry percentages here. ''detection.phenomenon'' does not, which is what the whole folding exercise is for — the family table is a set of rankings with an honest residue, not a measurement. |
| * **The 83 is a floor.** A paper that studies fingerprinting without the extractor recording a fingerprint-named phenomenon is missing from it. 103 further papers name a fingerprint only in the ''technique'' field and were deliberately excluded, since "we detected X by fingerprinting the TLS stack" is a paper about X. | * **The 83 is a floor.** A paper that studies fingerprinting without the extractor recording a fingerprint-named phenomenon is missing from it. 103 further papers name a fingerprint only in the ''technique'' field and were deliberately excluded, since "we detected X by fingerprinting the TLS stack" is a paper about X. |
| * **Quotes were spot-checked.** ''%%scripts/quote_check.mjs --detection fingerprint%%'' verifies the evidence quotes behind this page in bulk against ''paper.cols.txt''; the results, and the ones that had to be read by hand, are on [[provenance:privacy:fingerprinting]]. The dataset's own "0.9% of quotes could not be located" figure was measured on the earlier 4,322-paper run and has not been re-measured. | * **Quotes were spot-checked.** ''%%scripts/quote_check.mjs --detection fingerprint%%'' verifies the evidence quotes behind this page in bulk — against the rendering the extractor read, and then, for anything below threshold, against an independent ''pypdf'' rendering of the same ''paper.pdf''. Of **544** quotes, 312 match exactly and 140 on at least 60% of their five-word windows; **50** are located only in the second rendering, which is a defect in the stored text rather than in the extraction, and **42** are below threshold in both. The results, and the ones that had to be read by hand, are on [[provenance:privacy:fingerprinting]]. The dataset's own "0.9% of quotes could not be located" figure was measured on the earlier 4,322-paper run and has not been re-measured. |
| * **Every query behind this section, the report script and its unedited output** are on [[provenance:privacy:fingerprinting]]; corpus-level caveats are on [[literature:corpus]]. | * **Every query behind this section, the report script and its unedited output** are on [[provenance:privacy:fingerprinting]]; corpus-level caveats are on [[literature:corpus]]. |
| |
