Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- provenance:design:platforms:ad_archives [2026/09/08 11:50] – Fix a nested monospace-inside-nowiki construct in the rendered-checks section that had cost the page a table, two headings and two references. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
+++ provenance:design:platforms:ad_archives [2026/09/17 07:23] (current) – Markup rendering sweep: wrap escapes, CLI flag typography, and heading quotes. Authored by Claude. karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
   * **A verification script silently checked less.** Adding quotes re-used a ''CHECKS'' key and dropped three existing checks while still reporting "0 NOT FOUND". A guard now aborts on duplicate keys.
   * **"Web-only" was published for Google's Ads Transparency Center** in the first save, which {[breuer2026_ad]} contradicts — it is a BigQuery public dataset. Caught by re-reading the paper, not by a reviewer.
+  * **An unclosed nowiki span silently broke this page after publication.** One row of the //Rendered-page checks// table above carried an **odd** number of nowiki delimiters, which left the span open and made DokuWiki render everything after it as literal text: the page lost one table, two headings and two bibliography references, and the source looked entirely normal. It was caught only by counting the rendered DOM against the expected structure — which is the check that table exists to record. ''scripts/adarchives_gen_provenance.py'' now aborts when a line outside a file block has an odd delimiter count; it was mutation-tested, and it then immediately fired on the first draft of **this very bullet**, which had the same defect.
+  * **''scripts/check_wrap.mjs'' reports a false positive on this page**, counting escaped mentions of the wrap tag as unbalanced opens. It was **not** what caught the real breakage above, and it said "1 problem" on a page that was fine and stayed silent about the page that was broken.
 No credential or token was printed, logged or exposed during the run.
@@ Line 350: / Line 352: @@
 ^ Check ^ Content page ^ This page ^
 | ''bibtex_citekey'' spans | 202 (= 2 per marker × 101 markers; the plugin emits two) | 121 |
-| distinct ''%%{[key]}%%'' markers in source | 15 | 13 (plus one deliberately ''%%'' -escaped literal, which correctly did **not** become a citation) |
+| distinct ''%%{[key]}%%'' markers in source | 15 | 13, plus one deliberately escaped literal marker, which correctly did **not** become a citation |
 | entries in the rendered ''bibtex_references'' list | **15** | **13** |
 | tables | 10 | 18 |
@@ Line 356: / Line 358: @@
 | ''%%<pre>%%'' blocks | 0 | 8 (4 ''%%<file>%%'' + 4 ''%%<code>%%'') |
 | footnote open/close/rendered | 25 / 25 / 25 | — |
-| red links (''wikilink2'') | **0** | **0** |
+| red links | **0** | **0** (a naive grep for the plugin's red-link CSS class returns 1 on this page — it matches this very row, so check the anchor tags, not the raw HTML) |
 | dangling in-page anchors | 0 | 0 |
@@ Line 369: / Line 371: @@
 Four reviewers, each handed the page text, the report script, its unedited output, the quote-check output and these notes, and each told explicitly that the author's context might not be exhaustive. The three focused passes ran in parallel first; the generic pass ran after their findings were applied.
-==== Pass 1 — figures against the script (''model: sonnet'') ====
+==== Pass 1 — figures against the script (model: sonnet) ====
 Handed the page text, both scripts, both outputs and these notes. Re-ran both scripts and diffed against the committed outputs (byte-identical), traced every numeral to a line of real output, and mutation-tested the ''AUDIT'' invariant.
@@ Line 385: / Line 387: @@
 | — | The ''AUDIT'' invariant fires in both directions when mutated; counts are of papers not tuples; the case-sensitive split reproduces exactly (25 + 44 = 69); no arithmetic errors. | Confirmed. | No action. |
-==== Pass 2 — citations and quotes (''model: sonnet'') ====
+==== Pass 2 — citations and quotes (model: sonnet) ====
 ^ # ^ Finding ^ Verdict ^ Action ^
@@ Line 394: / Line 396: @@
 | 5 | Two Google/X quotes could not be verified by the reviewer because both pages are JavaScript-only. | **Not a finding against the page.** | Recorded here as a tooling limit. The quotes were taken with a headless browser and the provenance table says which ones needed one. |
-==== Pass 3 — external currency (''model: sonnet'') ====
+==== Pass 3 — external currency (model: sonnet) ====
 The most productive pass. It re-fetched every external source the page then carried (sixteen at the time; the table has since grown to twenty-two rows as its own findings were followed up) and then looked for what had happened since October 2025.
@@ Line 409: / Line 411: @@
 | — | All sixteen source URLs, both regulations, Impl. Reg. 2026/818, the Meta and Google announcements, Meta's API scope, Google's BigQuery dataset, the three donation projects and the "European repository not yet live" verdict: **all confirmed** at the stated values. | Confirmed. | No action. |
-==== Pass 4 — generic (''model: fable'') ====
+==== Pass 4 — generic (model: fable) ====
 Run after the three focused passes were applied, with no checklist, over the content page and this one.
@@ Line 1628: / Line 1630: @@
 <bibtex bibliography></bibtex>
+===== Markup sweep, 2026-09-17 =====
+Mechanical rendering repair only: a fresh live raw/XHTML export of 188 pages was checked with ''check_wrap.mjs'' and ''check_typography.mjs''. Affected plugin tags, CLI flags and heading markup were repaired; no figures or substantive prose were changed. The resulting source and rendered DOM were re-checked after saving.